• email
  • share

Elena O. Gekker

Elena O. GekkerAssociateDownload PDFvCard510.808.2000


Elena Gekker is an Associate with the Land Use and Environmental Law Practice groups. Her experience includes appellate and trial litigation for corporate and government clients. Elena has seamlessly transitioned her broad litigation experience to California Environmental Quality Act claims, assisting in the representation of public and private clients in both defending and bringing CEQA challenges to various development projects, at trial and appellate level. She has also worked on the pre-litigation CEQA review process. In addition to land use work, Elena also litigates environmental law claims, and has assisted in litigation regarding Proposition 65, the Endangered Species Act, and CERCLA, among others. Elena also provides advisory and transactional support to public and private clients. She has assisted in advising local agencies regarding relevant land use and zoning laws, and other municipality-specific requirements and restrictions.

Prior to joining Meyers Nave, Elena worked for a Top 50 AmLaw firm, representing corporate clients in financial services litigation. She has argued before the California Court of Appeal and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; served as lead attorney and supervised junior attorneys; participated in formal court mediation and numerous informal settlements; appeared at pre-trial hearings and conferences; drafted pre- and post-trial motions; taken witness depositions and conducted discovery; and, drafted appellate briefs and other submissions to the California Court of Appeal, California Supreme Court, and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, as well as courts of other states.

After law school, Elena served as a research attorney with the San Francisco County Superior Court, where she advised and worked closely with judges and court officers in various departments. During law school, Elena was a legal intern at the San Francisco Office of the City Attorney, where she dealt with matters involving constitutional issues such as private citizen’s rights to record public officials, First Amendment freedom of speech protections, and equal protection applicability to same-gender schools.


Unsolicited e-mails do not create an attorney-client relationship and confidential or secret information included in such e-mails cannot be protected from disclosure. Please do not include any confidential, secret or otherwise sensitive information concerning any potential or actual legal matter in your e-mail message. Thank you.