Meyers Nave Named Tier 1 Among “Best Law Firms” in Oakland for Environmental and Natural Resources Law by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® in 2020

Meyers Nave proudly announces that our statewide Environmental Law and Natural Resources Law practice groups have been recognized as Tier 1 among “Best Law Firms” in the metropolitan Oakland, California region by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® in 2020. The ranking process requires a Firm to have at least one attorney who is recognized in the current edition of the Best Lawyers in America, and Meyers Nave is proud to announce that six of our attorneys are recognized as “Best Lawyers” in their fields. The “Best Law Firms” ranking process also includes a confidential evaluation survey completed by clients, professional references and peer attorneys. Data is also collected from “Best Lawyers” ballots and the information that each law firm provides about the strengths of its areas of expertise. The quantitative and qualitative data is then combined into an overall Tier score for each firm.

Meyers Nave congratulates its Environmental Law and Natural Resources Law Practice Groups on this important recognition.

Best Law Firms in America by US News-Best Law Firms Report

Tier 1, Environmental Law (metropolitan Oakland, 2020)
Tier 1, Natural Resources Law (metropolitan Oakland, 2015-2020)

Meyers Nave Proudly Serves as Go-To Land Use and Environmental Counsel on High-Profile, Large-Scale Projects Throughout California

Our Land Use and Environmental Law Practice attorneys are well known for working on many of California’s most prominent civil infrastructure projects, industrial sites, mixed-use developments, and sports and entertainment facilities. We provide sophisticated transactional, litigation and regulatory compliance assistance to public agencies, business entities and public-private partnerships that develop, plan, build, operate and maintain these large-scale projects throughout the state. The team is led by Amrit Kulkarni, a member of Meyers Nave’s Executive Committee and chair of the Land Use, Environmental Law, and Transportation & Infrastructure Practice Groups.

Our expertise has been recognized since 2014 when Law360 described Meyers Nave as “one of the leading firms for local governments and public agencies throughout the state as well as private clients focused on complex, public-facing transportation and development projects. Meyers Nave’s ability to get large projects completed, secure major litigation wins and resolve crises landed the firm a spot among Law360′s California Powerhouses.” Meyers Nave attorneys are recognized in the 2020 edition of The Best Lawyers in America in Land Use and Zoning Law, Land Use and Zoning Litigation, Environmental Law, Natural Resources Law, and Environmental Litigation. Meyers Nave also received Tier 1 recognition in the 2020 edition of The Best Law Firms in America in the areas of Environmental Law and Natural Resources Law for the Oakland Metropolitan region.

We work on projects that are high-profile, mission-critical, economically and regionally significant, and often involve overlapping jurisdictions of multiple state and federal government agencies. Our work on these projects includes:

  • Providing strategic legal guidance to navigate large-scale projects through CEQA, NEPA and other land use and environmental approval processes, including extensive assistance during the master planning stages.
  • Coordinating proactively with government regulators, decision-makers, communities and other key stakeholders to avoid and resolve disputes in the project planning and approval phases.
  • Litigating hundreds of cases challenging development projects throughout the state and at every level of the judicial process, including the California Supreme Court, with an outstanding track record of success.
  • Advising on options for streamlining the CEQA process.

Representative Experience

P3 For $2 Billion Passenger Rail Infrastructure Project
In a precedent-setting undertaking, Facebook and infrastructure developer Plenary Group have jointly established a public-private partnership with the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) to develop a massive transportation infrastructure project that will create a new commuter rail corridor between Silicon Valley and the East Bay. The project’s estimated cost is $2 billion. Meyers Nave serves as lead land use, environmental and CEQA/NEPA counsel to the private partner for the project, including advising on all local, state and federal permitting issues. The P3 project is a game-changing approach to creating commuting alternatives that help solve metropolitan area traffic congestion between residential neighborhoods and job centers. It will serve as a model for how the public and private sectors can partner on critical infrastructure projects.

Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA)/Los Angeles International Airport (LAX)
For more than a decade, Meyers Nave has served as land use and environmental counsel in connection with development and implementation of the Los Angeles International Airport Master Plan’s $13-billion expansion. Our work includes defending the Master Plan against four consolidated lawsuits alleging NEPA, CEQA and California Coastal Act claims. We have also worked with CARB and SCAQMD and advised on state and federal regulatory and permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act and California’s State Implementation Plan. Currently, we represent LAWA in CEQA and NEPA review of the Airfield and Terminal Modernization Program, which includes airfield enhancements, new terminal facilities, and an improved system of roadways leading to the central terminal area. We are also advising on the development of plans to modernize existing air cargo facilities along the Century Boulevard corridor. Our team also advised LAWA in the preparation of Part 161 Studies for LAX and the Van Nuys Airport, and served as outside counsel for the environmental review of the $240 million South Airfield Improvement Project, the first to be implemented under the LAX Master Plan. We also provide LAWA with advice on operations that involve diesel-fueled equipment, mobile sources of emissions, and enforcement issues, as well as legal analysis with respect to regulation of taxis to meet emission requirements focusing on SCAQMD’s jurisdiction.

Port of Los Angeles Master Plan and Project Implementation
Meyers Nave serves as lead outside counsel in connection with environmental compliance and land use permitting for multiple large‐scale cargo, shipping and transportation projects for container terminals and dockside intermodal railyards. We have reviewed major project EIRs and EISs for CEQA and NEPA compliance, and our representation includes working with the California Air Resources Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and California Coastal Commission. We have also advised the Port on multiple long‐term planning projects, including the Port Master Plan Update. Meyers Nave has also represented the Port in several major CEQA cases in both the trial and appellate courts and have an outstanding track record of litigation victories on POLA’s behalf. Our work includes the (1) Pacific L.A. Marine Terminal, Tank Farms, and Pipelines Project, (2) Berths 302-206 (APL) Container Terminal Project, (3) Berths 97-109 (China Shipping) Container Terminal Project, (4) Clean Trucks Program, (5) Trapac Container Terminal Project, and (6) Ultramar Inc. (Valero) Marine Terminal Lease Renewal Project. All shipping terminal projects we advise on also involve regional and local air quality concerns due to emissions from shipping, on‐dock vehicles, and train and truck traffic.

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad’s Southern California Gateway Project
Meyers Nave represents BNSF in seven consolidated lawsuits and related appeals challenging the company’s planned $700 million rail yard transfer facility on CEQA and other environmental impact and environmental justice grounds, as well as federal preemption issues. The Project will transform the process for moving imported shipping containers from the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to a new state‐of‐the art near‐dock rail yard, reducing regional air pollution and traffic by eliminating 1.3 million short-haul truck trips per year. We also are advising BNSF on partnering with the California High‐Speed Rail Authority for CEQA and NEPA review of a project to redevelop existing rail corridors, in coordination with multiple jurisdictions, to operate high‐speed passenger service on a segment of BNSF‐owned track from Los Angeles Union Station to Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center. The project includes coordinated NEPA and Section 404 consultation with the Federal Railroad Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP)
Meyers Nave serves as outside counsel for LADWP on land use, environmental and water rights matters, as well as CEQA litigation defense.  We represent LADWP on the environmental review of the Elysian Reservoir Water Quality Improvement Project and the Stone Canyon Reservoir Water Quality Improvement Project—two projects to bring open reservoirs into compliance with updated Environmental Protection Agency drinking water quality standards. Our representation of LADWP in numerous litigated matters includes (1) complex statewide litigation filed by the San Diego County Water Authority challenging the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California’s adoption of rates and charges for imported water, (2) litigation over LADWP’s water rights to Mammoth Creek and the Owens River, and (3) litigation regarding changes to a mitigation measure in an EIR that analyzed a historic water agreement for the City’s aqueduct and transfer of water from Owens Valley to Los Angeles.

Our work has also included guiding LADWP through the regulatory process for implementation of a multi-billion dollar dust control program on Owens Lake, involving thousands of acres of federal property owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). providing sophisticated and complex air quality advice to guide LADWP through the SIP-approved regulatory framework that requires a multi-billion dollar dust control program on Owens Lake, involving thousands of acres of federal property owned by the Bureau of Land Management. We have worked in consultation with interested tribal groups and coordination with This work includes ongoing consultation with interested tribal groups. Meyers Nave has worked in coordination with BLM, U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other federal agencies to obtain necessary approvals, prepare air quality and SIP review, CEQA/NEPA review, and negotiate lease/access agreements to implement the project. Meyers Nave is also advising LADWP on a plan for management of City-owned lands in the upper Owens River basin, which includes habitat for the federally protected Sage Grouse.

Oakland A’s MLB  Stadium and Mixed-Use Development Project
In addition to providing general CEQA advice to the City of Oakland on major development projects, Meyers Nave serves as outside land use and environmental counsel to the City for a waterfront ballpark and mixed-use development project at the Port of Oakland’s Howard Terminal. The project includes a 35,000-seat ballpark, 3,000 residential units, 1.5 million sq. ft. of office, 270,000 sq. ft. of retail, a 400-room hotel and a 3,500-seat performance venue. We are advising on the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (CEQA), land use entitlements, and project-related agreements including the Development Agreement and Community Benefits Agreement. We also are advising on compliance with special streamlining legislation (AB 734). The project straddles jurisdictions of several agencies with different regulations and permitting processes, including the State Lands Commission (tide and submerged land issues) and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (San Francisco Bay Plan issues).

City of Anaheim’s “Big A 2050” Plan for Orange County’s only MLB Stadium
Meyers Nave serves as lead land use and CEQA counsel to the City of Anaheim for a mixed-use development and stadium project, known as Big A 2050, on the site of an existing Los Angeles Angels stadium. The project envisions redevelopment of the stadium site to introduce large-scale residential, office, and retail/entertainment uses to create a year-round use. The plan is designed to keep major league baseball in Anaheim for the next 30+ years. Meyers Nave is advising on all entitlements and environmental review required to bring the plan to fruition including a Disposition and Development Agreement, site plans, tentative maps and other required approvals. The project is a key element to the City realizing its vision for the development of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use area which is located adjacent to the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center which provides rail, bus, taxi and other services for daily commuters and visitors.

Sacramento’s $477 Million Downtown NBA Arena and Mixed-Use Development Project
Meyers Nave defeated every legal challenge against the new $477 million downtown arena for the Sacramento Kings NBA team, ensuring completion on schedule to keep the team from moving to Seattle.  Our victories included: (1) an eminent domain victory giving the City of Sacramento permission to take over the final piece of downtown property, (2) a published appellate decision denying a CEQA-based challenge to the project, (3) a published appellate decision denying a constitutional challenge to the special statute passed to streamline the City’s CEQA review of the proposed arena (the first appellate decision concerning the constitutionality of project-specific CEQA streamlining statutes), and (4) an 11-day trial alleging that the public-private partnership engaged in a “secret subsidy,” collusion, fraud, concealment, waste and illegal expenditure of public funds, along with alleged illegalities in the City’s bond financing. The trial victory was recognized by The Daily Journal among the “Top Defense Results” of the year.

Mixed-Use Development Project and Transit Station Adjacent to SAP Arena
Since 2011, Meyers Nave has assisted the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on land use and environmental matters for implementation of long-range plans to expand public rail transit into the South Bay and Silicon Valley, including bringing BART from Fremont through San Jose to Santa Clara. Our cases currently include representing VTA in a lawsuit filed by the San Jose Sharks alleging violations of CEQA and NEPA relating to BART’s multi-year four-station extension into downtown San Jose and Santa Clara. Meyers Nave has advised VTA on multiple transit expansion projects, such as the Eastridge to BART Connector/Capitol Expressway Light Rail Project, a three-mile extension of an elevated transit line and accessory passenger station, and a multi-phased six-station project to bring BART from Fremont through San Jose to Santa Clara, which runs through several jurisdictions and spans the CEQA and NEPA process, Section 404 permitting, and coordination with numerous local, state and federal agencies.

UC Multi-Campus Long-Range Development Plans and Implementation
For more than a decade, Meyers Nave has served as lead land use and environmental counsel to the University of California on high-profile and complex capital development and public-private partnership projects across the statewide system. We currently advise UC on the CEQA review of a new generation of Long Range Development Plans to guide future development to accommodate enrollment growth of over 20,000 new students on campuses throughout the UC system, including UCLA, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Santa Cruz, UC Riverside, and UC San Diego. For the planning process, we help guide the campuses through the CEQA and regulatory approval process for individual projects that add and expand administration offices, student and workforce housing, student services, academic buildings, research centers and healthcare facilities often using public-private partnerships and innovative funding mechanisms. We also represent UC in the Merced 2020 project, implementing the preliminary aspects of an innovative public-private master development plan to accommodate a planned increase in students from 6,800 to 10,000. The pioneering project involves negotiating a range of new and innovative agreements, such as utility services and transportation agreements with the City of Merced and Merced County, as well as agreements to implement wetland mitigation requirements.

Crossroads of the World Redevelopment Project
Meyers Nave represents the City of Los Angeles in CEQA litigation over redevelopment of the iconic Crossroads of the World site on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood. We prevailed at the trial court in expedited CEQA litigation for this significant transit-oriented development project, including 950 apartments and condos, 308‐room hotel, and 190,000 square feet of commercial space in three buildings of up to 32 stories. The Governor certified the project as an Environmental Leadership Development Project under AB 900, entitling it to a compressed litigation schedule that requires resolving trial and appellate litigation in an expedited 270-day timeframe. The project preserves 1930s-era buildings and transforms a prominent Hollywood site with new affordable housing and open space.

8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed-Use Development Project
Meyers Nave serves as a primary outside land use and environmental litigation counsel to the City of Los Angeles in a number of cases challenging land use and CEQA approvals for a wide range of projects that are part of the City’s long-range efforts to revitalize the downtown area. Governor Brown has designated many of these projects as Environmental Leadership Development Projects, the regulations for which require that all legal challenges be expedited by the courts to be resolved 270 days after project approval. One project is the innovative Frank Gehry-designed project that will create a gateway to Hollywood on the Sunset Strip. We defeated the expedited CEQA litigation challenges for the 330,000-square-foot sustainably designed, mixed-use high-rise development project. The project features five interrelated structures, including two residential buildings (which include affordable and low-income housing), distinct buildings for retail and entertainment, and open spaces for public gathering. Four different CEQA lawsuits were brought against the project, which is designated an Environmental Leadership Development Project.

City of Rancho Cordova’s Largest Land Development Project
Meyers Nave assisted the City of Rancho Cordova in the planning, development and approval of the City’s largest land development project. The 3,828-acre master-planned community consists of 12,189 residential units, nine schools, 247 acres of commercial space, 269 acres of industrial park, 510 acres of wetland preserve, 178 acres of community parks, and 16 miles of trails. Our work also included land use entitlements, an EIR/EIS, development agreement, specific plan, affordable housing agreement, and finance plan. The project will transform a mine tailings site into a community with schools, parks and retail.

Oyster Point Life Science and Technology Campus and Marina Ferry Village
Meyers Nave served as lead negotiator for the City of South San Francisco and its former redevelopment agency for a public-private partnership for a 2.25-million-square-foot life sciences and technology campus, including office and research facilities, two hotels, retail marina and public recreation open space on the San Francisco Bay waterfront. We advised on the preparation and negotiation of (1) a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, zone change, subdivision map and owner participation agreements, (2) disposition and development agreement that involved the sale of land owned by the City and provided public and private financing for public infrastructure improvements valued at more than $70 million, and (3) agreement with the harbor district regarding facility improvements.

Five Meyers Nave Attorneys Selected as “Super Lawyers”

Meyers Nave proudly announces that five of our attorneys are included in the 2019 lists of Northern California Super Lawyers and Southern California Super Lawyers. Their legal expertise and professional accomplishments also reflect the high regard of numerous Meyers Nave practices and demonstrate Meyers Nave’s reputation for excellent client work from our offices throughout California.

We congratulate the following attorneys:

Northern California Super Lawyers
Julia Bond – Environmental Litigation, Land Use/Zoning, Appellate  (2008-2012, 2015-2019)
Shaye Diveley – Environmental, Land Use/Zoning, Natural Resources, (2012-2019)
Eric Firstman – Construction Litigation (2007-2019)
Amrit Kulkarni – Environmental Litigation, Land Use/Zoning (2012-2019)

Southern California Super Lawyers
Julia Bond – Environmental Litigation, Land Use/Zoning, Appellate (2018-2019)
Deborah Fox – Constitutional Law, Land Use/Zoning, Environmental (2017-2019)
Amrit Kulkarni – Environmental Litigation, Land Use/Zoning (2012-2019)

About Super Lawyers®: Super Lawyers® evaluates attorneys from firms of all sizes in more than 70 practice areas throughout the United States. Super Lawyers® selects lawyers who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers Magazine, which publishes the lists, is distributed to attorneys and ABA-accredited law schools.

Remembering and Honoring Blake P. Loebs

It is with great sadness that we convey the difficult news of the passing of Blake Philip Loebs, a Principal in the Trial and Litigation Practice Group in the Oakland office of Meyers Nave. The Firm’s thoughts are with Blake’s wife, Alisa, and their two young children, Ryan and Amanda. Our thoughts also go out to the many friends at Meyers Nave and outside the Firm who worked with and admired Blake. For all of us, Blake was a reliable friend, dedicated colleague and compassionate human being. Everyone at Meyers Nave considers it a great privilege to have worked with Blake and include him as part of our family. We will always remember and cherish his personable, thoughtful and helpful manner.

Blake joined Meyers Nave after serving 22 years as a Deputy City Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco. As Chief of Civil Rights Litigation for nine years for the City and County of San Francisco, Blake supervised civil rights litigation for a 22-member trial team in the office that The American Lawyer described as “one of the most aggressive and talented city law departments in the nation.” In 2013, the San Francisco Police Officers Association honored Blake as the “Citizen of the Year” and awarded him the Medal of Honor, the two highest honors that can be bestowed on civilians, reflecting his special expertise defending police officers and the police officer profession. Blake’s impressive record includes being undefeated in over 30 jury trials and obtaining published decisions that continue to serve as legal authority today.  Blake served his clients and his community with steadfast leadership, integrity and honor.

Memorial Services and Donations
Condolences for Blake’s family can be sent to LoebsFamilyCondolences@meyersnave.com. A memorial service will be held on Sunday, July 14 in the Rotunda at San Francisco City Hall. Services will be from 2:00–4:00 PM followed by a reception from 4:00–6:00 PM in the City Hall’s North Light Court. In lieu of flowers, a trust has been established to offset education expenses for Blake’s young children. Memorial contributions can be made to The Loebs Minors Trust, P.O. Box 561, Corte Madera, CA 94925. Please click here to read Blake’s obituary published on SFGate.com.

Deborah Fox selected among the 75 “Most Influential Women Lawyers” in Los Angeles

Meyers Nave proudly announces that the Los Angeles Business Journal selected Deborah Fox to its 2019 list of the “Most Influential Women Lawyers” in Los Angeles.  The Journal selected 75 women lawyers from 421 nominations. As the publication explains, “The attorneys listed in these pages were chosen to be recognized for exceptional legal skill across the full spectrum of responsibility; exemplary leadership, as evidenced by the highest professional and ethical standards; and for contributions to the Los Angeles community at large. Congratulations to the extraordinary women who made this list.”

The Journal’s description of Deborah’s professional expertise is copied below.

Deborah Fox is a Principal in the Los Angeles office of Meyers Nave. She is a member of the firm’s three-person Executive Committee. She founded, built and leads two of the firm’s most prominent statewide practices – its Trial and Litigation practice and its First Amendment practice.  Fox’s cases frequently involve issues that attract intense media attention and public scrutiny, including matters of first impression. She is well known for handling matters that are already front-page news or likely to become a headline as the case unfolds and after it concludes.

Fox’s complex litigation experience includes multi-party and multi-district cases, civil litigations that are intertwined with pending criminal actions, and matters that require managing, researching, reviewing and interpreting extensive electronic information. She is selected by government entities, such as cities, counties and special districts, to handle their highest profile, most complex and often most controversial litigation matters.

 

Meyers Nave Litigators Help Clients Win Their High-Stakes Cases

Meyers Nave litigation attorneys obtain victories at the trial and appellate level on many of our clients’ most complex, highest profile and strategically important cases throughout California. Below are examples of litigation successes covering a broad spectrum of our areas of expertise, including Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, Land Use, First Amendment, Construction, Crisis Management, Finance and Economic Development. Meyers Nave recently shared our insights on high-stakes litigation as the moderator and presenter at a California Minority Counsel Program panel discussion in our Oakland office on the topic of “Strategies for Handling High-Profile Litigation.”

Shelter In Place Orders and Reopening Plan Litigation re: Coronavirus Pandemic
Meyers Nave is defending counties, cities and public officials throughout California in federal and state court litigation challenging Shelter In Place Orders, Public Health Orders, and Reopening Plans related to the coronavirus pandemic. Plaintiffs are churches, gyms, nail salons, brew pubs, wine bars, restaurants, lodging establishments, and other businesses challenging restrictions that are placed on the operation of their organizations. Our cases also include defending local government entities in class actions that request the refund of business and licensing fees, permits and taxes paid by organizations that are closed or are operating under various restrictions. The issues involve complex constitutional questions regarding local and state governmental powers during public health and safety emergencies intertwined with alleged violations of various rights under the California and U.S. Constitutions, ranging from First Amendment freedoms of expression, religion and assembly to civil rights claims for alleged violations of substantive and procedural due process and equal protection. Meyers Nave has obtained precedent-setting victories at both the district and appellate court levels which deny plaintiffs’ attempts to block enforcement of such Shelter In Place Orders and Reopening Plans.

City of Palmdale Catastrophic Rain Storm with 0.1% Chance of Occurring
Meyers Nave successfully defended the City of Palmdale in actions brought by 30+ plaintiffs involving inverse condemnation, nuisance, negligence, and trespass claims as a result of a massive rain storm that caused substantial flash flooding and debris flow. The storm was rated “return frequency” of 1000 years, which means 0.1% of occurring, and overwhelmed the City’s public works infrastructure. Our team’s successes included (1) negotiating the dismissal of Palmdale from one action within a few months of the filing of the action, (2) winning a dispositive motion for summary judgment in another case for judgment based on establishing that the epic storm was an intervening factor that broke the causal chain for liability, and (3) obtaining a definitive legal ruling on a summary judgment motion that served as the catalyst to get the remaining cases settled and involved payment by the pooling entity with a minimal contribution from the City.

TRO Protects Client’s Business in a Trade Secret Theft Case
Meyers Nave commercial litigators obtained a Temporary Restraining Order to protect a client company’s trade secrets and greatly reduce unfair competition from a business that two employees set up with stolen confidential information. The San Francisco-based global client is one of the world’s leading purveyors of high-value, collectible vintage and modern timepieces. The case involved a former employee and a current employee who had access to customer information, a lead-generation customer wish list, and pricing and margin information. The former employee left the client company and within months launched a competing business. The other participant, while still working at the client company, provided the former employee with client contact information, shared proprietary pricing data, and steered customers to the former employee. The defendants are immediately enjoined from further use or disclosure of the client company’s information and must immediately return all such information in whatever form. The Meyers Nave victory was litigated in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California and asserted claims under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, a new law that is increasingly being used by companies throughout the U.S.

Los Angeles County Land Use and Environmental Protection Litigation Win
Meyers Nave’s Trial and Litigation Practice Group achieved a closely watched victory for the County of Los Angeles in a final ruling that awarded $6.6 million in attorneys’ fees, sanctions and civil penalties plus permanent injunctive relief in a case that involved the illegal transport and dumping of concrete and other construction debris in an ecologically sensitive region in the Santa Susana Mountains. Relying on drone surveillance and more than 500 exhibits, Meyers Nave initially obtained a preliminary injunction banning all Class 6 trucks and higher from the illegal waste disposal operation, along with additional restrictions including requiring defendant to post No Dumping signs and submit a conditional use permit and engineered grading application to address hillside stability issues. After granting our motion for summary judgment, the Court ordered briefing on the appropriate remedies. The Court’s subsequent ruling granted a permanent injunction banning Class 6 and higher trucks, the most effective deterrent for the County to halt the dumping and parades of trucks through the canyon. Civil penalties and attorneys’ fees were awarded in the amount of $6,638,192.33.  For violating the County’s Zoning, Grading, and Building Codes, the Court assessed civil penalties of $4,893,000.  For violating the state Unfair Competition Law, the Court assessed an additional penalty of $800,000.  The Court also awarded the County $945,192.33 in attorneys’ fees. In a press release, Fifth District Supervisor Kathryn Barger described the judge’s ruling as “an important victory for communities and the environment.”

$477 Million Downtown Arena for the Sacramento Kings
Meyers Nave defeated every legal challenge against the new $477 million downtown arena for the Sacramento Kings NBA team, including (1) an eminent domain victory giving the City of Sacramento permission to take over the final piece of downtown property, (2) a published appellate decision denying a CEQA-based challenge to the project, (3) a published appellate decision denying a constitutional challenge to the special statute passed to streamline the City’s CEQA review of the proposed arena (the first appellate decision concerning the constitutionality of project-specific CEQA streamlining statutes), and (4) an 11-day trial alleging that the public-private partnership engaged in a “secret subsidy,” collusion, fraud, concealment, waste and illegal expenditure of public funds, along with alleged illegalities in the City’s bond financing. The case settled for dismissal of all claims with prejudice in exchange for a waiver of costs subsequent to the Court finding that “plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden of proof on any of their causes of action.” The trial victory was recognized by The Daily Journal among the “Top Defense Results” of the year. SuperLawyers magazine also featured attorney Shaye Diveley’s appellate victories in an article titled “From Way Downtown: That’s how Sacramento attorney Shaye Diveley helped deliver an arena for the Kings-and just before the buzzer.”

Eminent Domain Victory
Meyers Nave’s client, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (“TAMC”), is constructing a new commuter rail project to extend passenger rail service from Santa Clara County to Salinas. TAMC acquired most of the property interests required for this Project but was unable to settle as to an industrial property where TAMC sought to acquire 2,156 square feet from one of the warehouses located thereon.  Prior to trial, the landowner’s final demand to settle was $1,900,000 and TAMC’s final offer to settle was $1,100,000. At trial, the landowner asked the jury to return a verdict in the sum of $2,200,000.  TAMC asked the jury to return a verdict in the sum of $800,000. The jury verdict was $1,271,217.00, which was $928,783 below the landowner’s appraised value and $727,783 below the landowner’s final settlement demand. Because the jury’s verdict was much closer to our client’s final offer (only $171,217 over) than the landowner’s final demand, Meyers Nave also saved TAMC from the possibility of the judge ordering TAMC to not only pay for the fair market value of the property (as determined by the jury), but also pay for all of the landowner’s attorneys’ fees and other litigation expenses.

California Supreme Court’s Most Prominent CEQA Case
Meyers Nave represented Lotus founder Mitch Kapor and his wife Freada Kapor Klein before the California Supreme Court in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley, a precedent-setting CEQA case that the Daily Journal featured in a cover story. The case also received extensive media attention and coverage in numerous Law360 articles, from an article that described it as “the biggest CEQA case the state’s high court will consider” to an article that described it as “a landmark CEQA case…to determine the fundamental legal nature and practical utility of CEQA’s regulatory exemptions.” The Court’s decision resolved years of uncertainty by holding that there must be “unusual circumstances” in order for an otherwise categorically exempt project to be subject to CEQA. The Court also resolved a divide among Courts of Appeal, holding that an agency’s findings as to unusual circumstances are subject to the substantial evidence standard. The Court established a new two-part test to analyze a project opponent’s assertion that a project presents “unusual circumstances” that require CEQA review.

$162 Million Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference Center/UCLA
The University of California’s General Counsel engaged Meyers Nave to help “bulletproof” the Environmental Impact Report for one of UCLA’s highest-profile projects, the 294,000-square-foot $162-million Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference and Guest Center. As expected, opposition groups filed lawsuits raising numerous challenges, including CEQA, zoning and taxation. Our guidance during the EIR administrative process with a focus on anticipating potential litigation was validated in a subsequent series of courtroom victories, culminating in an appellate judge rejecting all CEQA claims filed by a community group. Meyers Nave also obtained the dismissal of claims that were filed against the Luskins with a published appellate decision confirming that financial support from private donors is expression protected by the constitutional right of free speech.

Largest Fine Against a Utility in the United States
For seven years, Meyers Nave served as Special Counsel to the City of San Bruno regarding a Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) natural gas pipeline explosion that killed eight people, injured 58 others and destroyed or damaged 90 homes. Meyers Nave’s work was instrumental in the imposition of a record $1.6 billion fine against PG&E, the largest ever levied against a utility in the U.S. Our work also uncovered political corruption at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and led to multiple state and federal investigations of the utility and public agency. A federal court jury convicted PG&E of one felony count of obstructing the federal probe of the blast and five felony counts of knowingly violating pipeline safety laws before and after the disaster. PG&E also subsequently agreed to pay $86.5 million in penalties and fines over 164 illegal ex parte communications it had with CPUC regulators over a five year period. The multi-faceted litigation also involved a California Public Records Act lawsuit for which the City of San Bruno received a James Madison Freedom of Information Award from the Northern California Society of Journalists. Law360 named Meyers Nave a “California Powerhouse” and noted that the firm “flexed its muscle” by “marshaling the City of San Bruno through the aftermath of a devastating pipeline explosion.” Meyers Nave led the total recovery of $126 million for the City of San Bruno. The firm’s work garnered numerous awards, including “Giant Slayer” (The Recorder), “Energy & Environmental Trailblazer” (National Law Journal), “Top Women Lawyers” (Daily Recorder) and “Top California Lawyers” (Daily Journal).

$380 Million Expansion at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
Meyers Nave represented Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in its breach-of-contract suit against Turner Construction regarding its failure to deliver a project which includes the construction of a 366,000 square foot 168-bed inpatient building, construction of a utility loop, and upgrades to the energy plant. During the course of the Project, there were disputes between the County and Turner regarding compliance with California building codes, workplace safety, quality of construction, and completing the project by the contracted dates. Meyers Nave finalized an agreement in which both parties agreed to a collaborative approach to finish the project in a reasonable time frame and a firm commitment on completion costs with a cap on additional costs.

Aliso Canyon/Porter Ranch Massive Natural Gas Leak
In County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Edison, Meyers Nave assisted the County of Los Angeles in a public health crisis regarding the largest methane gas release in U.S. history. The Meyers Nave crisis litigation team urgently assessed the legal landscape, consulted with the public health department, and successfully obtained a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction that allowed 3,000 relocated families to remain in safe alternative housing. The Aliso Canyon gas leak (also called Porter Ranch gas leak) was a massive natural gas leak from a well in an underground storage facility in the Santa Susana Mountains near Porter Ranch, Los Angeles. California Governor Jerry Brown issued a state of emergency for what was internationally reported to have been the largest and worst single natural gas leak in U.S. history.

Adult Entertainment Business Shut Down After 2.5 Year Battle
After a three-week trial, Meyers Nave convinced a judge to grant a permanent injunction to close EyeCandy Showgirls, a business advertising itself as providing “the only nude lap dance in San Diego County.” The defendants in the case – owners of several strip clubs in Southern California – had touted their experience obtaining victories against other municipalities awarding millions in attorney’s fees and damages to the adult use operator. The judge agreed with Meyers Nave that the business was operating unlawfully, was in violation of zoning codes, and was a public nuisance that must be shut down. The trial court also overruled objections and granted the City’s cost bill, which included a trial technician assisting with 350 exhibits, including maps, photos and videos, for a total recovery of $50,000. Meyers Nave also helped Chula Vista update and revise its adult business ordinances.

 

Law360 Recognizes Meyers Nave as ‘California Powerhouse’ Firm

The nationwide legal industry website, Law360, is featuring Meyers Nave as one of the publication’s 20 California Powerhouse law firms—an elite list on which Meyers Nave is the smallest and one of the youngest firms.

In its feature story, Law360 describes how Meyers Nave has grown—in just 27 years—“from a small municipal law firm in the San Francisco Bay Area into one of the leading firms for local governments and public agencies throughout the state as well as private clients focused on complex, public-facing transportation and development projects.”

As examples of Meyers Nave’s “muscle,” the article cites the firm’s landmark public pension reform litigation, its work for the City of San Bruno in the aftermath of a devastating gas pipeline explosion, and its representation of the City of Sacramento in its ongoing efforts to build a new home for the Kings NBA franchise.

Meyers Nave Managing Partner David Skinner, firm Co-founder Steve Meyers, and Land Use Practice Group Chair Amrit Kulkarni, are all quoted in the article regarding the firm’s overall strengths and notable client successes.

The full article is available for viewing here.

About Meyers Nave

A full-service law firm, Meyers Nave represents a diverse range of clients whose day-to-day operations and legal matters often play out on California’s public stage. The entities we serve—from public agencies to national corporations and high-visibility healthcare, transportation, and education institutions—depend not only on our legal prowess but our aptitude for navigating complex government frameworks and sensitive public relations issues. We leverage this critical combination of skill to deliver creative, cost-effective strategies for large-scale projects, regulatory compliance, litigation, and operational concerns involving everything from labor and employment to finance and policy development.