Meyers Nave Recognized as one of the 2023 “Most Admired Law Firms to Work For”

Meyers Nave is honored to be recognized by the Los Angeles Business Journal as one of the Most Admired Law Firms to Work for in 2023.

Our firm takes great pride in our exceptional team, valued clients, collaborative accomplishments, and the diversity, principles, and professionalism that our firm embodies.

Read article here.

Eric Casher appointed to serve as the Ninth Circuit representative to the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary (FJC)

We are honored to congratulate Eric Casher on his recent appointment to serve as the Ninth Circuit representative to the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary (FJC).

The responsibility of the FJC encompasses a thorough assessment of the integrity, professional acumen, and judicial demeanor of the President’s nominees for Federal judicial positions. Eric’s pivotal role will encompass the meticulous review and evaluation of nominees to all Ninth Circuit courts.

Thank you Eric for your time and contributions to this significant organization.

Pictured: Mary Smith, incoming President of the American Bar Association (to be the first ever Native American woman to hold the position of President of the ABA), Eric Casher, Meyers Nave Principal, and Honorable Ann Claire Williams (Ret.), Chair of the ABA Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary (a retired U.S. Circuit and U.S. Court of Appeals judge from the Sixth Circuit).

Janice Brown recognized as a 2023 “Women of Influence in Law” honoree by the San Diego Business Journal

We would like to congratulate Janice Brown, Meyers Nave Principal on being recognized as a 2023 “Women of Influence in Law” honoree by the San Diego Business Journal. Janice’s contributions to our firm, our clients, our attorneys, our staff, and our community are invaluable.

We are proud to celebrate her success in making a lasting impact on the legal profession.

View all honorees here:
San Diego Business Journal 2023 Women of Influence in Law



Deborah J. Fox: Daily Journal 2023 Top Women Lawyer

June 21, 2023

Congratulations to Deborah J. Fox who has once again been selected by the Daily Journal as a Top Women Lawyer.

Deborah’s unwavering dedication and expertise continues to deliver outstanding results and remarkable achievements. To quote Deborah herself, “In the face of challenges, [she is] driven to advocate fiercely for [her] clients, protecting their rights and pursuing justice…” Her “recent victories and ongoing cases reaffirm our commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and ensuring the best outcomes for our clients.

Learn more about Deborah Fox and her Trial and Litigation Practice.



Sackett v. EPA: What Lies Ahead for Water Regulation and Wetland Protection?

On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Sackett v. EPA case in favor of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and instead held that the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) only protects wetlands which are indistinguishable from waters of the United States.

In a unanimous decision, the Court rejected the significant nexus test previously used to protect wetlands with an ecological relationship to navigable waters. There was sharp disagreement on what the new rule should be, with four justices disagreeing that wetlands must have a continuous surface connection with waters of the United States to be granted CWA protection.

Nevertheless, the majority’s decision further restricted water bodies that can qualify as “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) and thereby receive the legal protections of the CWA.

What Does This Mean for Wetlands?

The Sackett decision provides a very clear standard that substantially restricts the federal government’s ability to regulate wetlands. Specifically, the Court ruled that for wetlands to be granted CWA protection, they must, first, be adjacent to a body of water that qualifies as “waters of the United States” and, second, have a continuous surface connection with those waters as indistinguishable parts. Under this rationale, according to the majority, wetlands that are entirely separate from traditional bodies of water do not fall under CWA jurisdiction. Following the Court’s decision, this means that projects across the country may no longer be subject to federal permitting, leaving the burden of protecting and regulating many wetlands to the states.

What Does This Mean for California?

The treatment of wetlands and waters regulated by the State of California will remain largely the same. The California State Water Resources Control Board, while disappointed in the Sackett decision, emphasized that it only narrows the scope of federal jurisdiction and does not weaken California’s more stringent protections for wetlands.[1] Having anticipated the Court’s decision, the State Water Board, moving forward, will increasingly rely upon California’s own regulatory wetlands protection programs which allow the Board to retain its authority to protect the 2.9 million acres of wetlands remaining in California today.[1]

What Does This Mean for Other Water Features?

The majority opinion is an express adoption of Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion in Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715, 742 (2006), which also served as the basis for the Trump Administration’s Navigable Waters Protection Rule.  The Court, shifting from the previous definition of WOTUS that encompassed all navigable waters and their adjacent tributaries and wetlands, limited this term in Sackett to include only those relatively permanent bodies of water forming geographical features ordinarily described as streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes.  While the nature and extent of Sackett’s impact on water bodies beyond wetlands is uncertain, the decision indicates that the Court considers permanency and navigability to be key factors in determining CWA jurisdiction, calling into question whether ephemeral streams and other water bodies that are not relatively permanent remain under federal oversight.  However, the Sackett decision did not provide clear direction to the EPA as to precisely how it must change its WOTUS rule.

What Are the Next Steps?

The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will interpret WOTUS according to the Court’s decision in Sackett. The agencies are currently reviewing the decision to determine their next appropriate steps, but stress the importance of a “common sense and science-based definition” of WOTUS to build upon the transformative progress the CWA has had thus far in preserving the nation’s waters for current and future generations.

If you have any questions about the decision and how it may impact your operations, please contact a member of Meyers Nave’s Water Law team.

[1] State Water Resources Control Board, California Water Boards, State Water Board Statement: U.S. Supreme Court Decision Decreases Federal Wetlands Protection (May 25, 2023).

[1] Id.